Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '21 at 22:03
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$62
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 196
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 376
46% 350 Pts
64-Core 383
24% 383 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.7% Average
Lighting 61.2
Reflection 61
Parallax 83.9
50% 68.7 fps
MRender 60.6
Gravity 66.9
Splatting 46.7
46% 58.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 36 37 39 39 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 209 213 216 217 219 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 163
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 213
109% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.2% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 21
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 20
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $392
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback