Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 2325CTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 2325CTO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2325CTO
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120724
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 27 '21 at 16:23
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 142
60% 99.2 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 198
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21FA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.83 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Orico M200 128GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T081
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 67 75 75 72 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 462
Write 129
Mixed 101
SusWrite 72.7
41% 191 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 14.7
66% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 97.4
DQ Mixed 13.8
36% 76.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 85%
External USB3.0 500GB
429GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 22 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 23.2
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 23.4
32% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 19.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2325CTO Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2325CTO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback