Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A7 V5.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster ABRA A7 V5.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A7 V5.2
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150331
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 20 '21 at 18:12
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$38
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 178
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 467
48% 387 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 6505) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.94% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 17
Parallax 5.6
3% 8.6 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.3
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.94%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 mSATA 128GB-$80
119GB free
Firmware: X231200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 293 294 292 294 294 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 461
Write 278
Mixed 206
SusWrite 293
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 28.3
105% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 122
125% 206 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
553GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 8.1 8.4 2.8 8.7 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 110
Write 40.3
Mixed 51.4
SusWrite 10.6
39% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GKH800SO51208-1600 Kingston 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 14.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.9
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A7 V5.2 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A7 V5.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback