Today's hottest deals

Asrock 990FX Professional

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Professional  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '17 at 11:34
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.55 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 78.1
2-Core 154
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 447
43% 353 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2600-PRO
Sapphire(174B E410) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 3.96
Parallax 1
2% 2.33 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 3.65
2% 2.28 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
165GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 89.8
Write 78.3
Mixed 91.7
66% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 2.34
4K Mixed 0.22
88% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2400C10-8GTX Corsair CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 F3-2400C10-8GTX Corsair CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.9% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.7
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Professional Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Professional

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback