Today's hottest deals

Zoostorm 7200-5300B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemZoostorm 7200-5300B  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H170-PRO
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '21 at 17:51
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 62%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$62
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 184
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 377
44% 345 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Lighting 72.7
Reflection 74.4
Parallax 67.4
59% 71.5 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 72
Splatting 68.4
56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR324 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 916 1335 1510 1652 1413 1612 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,433
Write 1,666
Mixed 1,288
SusWrite 1,406
327% 1,448 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 46.1
135% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 826
DQ Write 717
DQ Mixed 1,000
687% 848 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 220%
Great: 332%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$69
844GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 75 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 106
Write 91.8
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 74.7
62% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 84%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
27GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 3.6 3.2 4.8 3.9 5.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
6.82% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 5.2
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 4.7
12% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 2.4
114% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.82%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G30C15U4W.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.4% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 19.6
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5300B Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Zoostorm 7200-5300B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback