Today's hottest deals

HP 700-010xt

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 700-010xt  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 12 '21 at 16:16
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 190
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 511
57% 447 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Device(1B0A 90C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 7.8
5% 6.97 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 0.1
4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
665GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 49 51 52 52 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 157
Write 148
Mixed 82.8
SusWrite 61.9
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 109%
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 1GB
1GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 7.8 8 7.9 8 7.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
4.87% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 7
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 7.9
12% 9.55 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.87%
Great: 5%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power128 126GB
68GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 62 81 81 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 150
Write 78.4
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 77.7
116% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
60% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 16.8
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-010xt Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP 700-010xt

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $356
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback