Today's hottest deals

HP 2133

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 2133  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3030
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '21 at 19:25
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
VIA C7-M 1600MHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 3.1
2-Core 4.9
23% 24 Pts
4-Core 6.2
8-Core 6.3
1% 6.25 Pts
64-Core 6.2
0% 6.2 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
VIA Chrome9 HC IGP WDDM 1.1
HP(103C 3030) 256MB
Driver: VTGUModeDX32.dll Ver. 8.14.14.81
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0
Reflection 0.1
0% 0.05 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9160827AS 160GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AHC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 42 44 43 43 7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 36
Write 40.1
Mixed 26
SusWrite 35.2
25% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.22% Terrible
MC Read 1.2
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 2
6% 2.23 GB/s
SC Read 0.6
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 1.3
4% 1.3 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.22%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback