Today's hottest deals

Asus Z97M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors, 2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 11:02
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 172
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 533
51% 421 Pts
64-Core 589
36% 589 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 92 93 93 91 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 292
Write 297
Mixed 248
SusWrite 92.8
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 24.8
87% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 294
225% 304 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
16GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 86 85 86 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 69.6
Write 81.6
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 85.6
53% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
70% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 72%
0 500GB
178GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 29 28 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 64.7
Write 68
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 28.5
37% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 66%
0 4TB
24GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 28.6
Write 31.3
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 13.6
19% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 93%
1 4TB
21GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 30.4
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 13.6
19% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 91%
1 4TB
63GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 48 47 49 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 81.1
Write 76.1
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 48.2
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 91%
0 4TB
34GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 48 47 49 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
47% Average
Read 115
Write 92.3
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 48.2
63% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 47%
Great: 93%
1 4TB
488GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 29 28 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 125
Write 115
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 28.4
63% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 91%
0 8TB
488GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 125
Write 155
Mixed 89.9
SusWrite 61.1
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.4
297% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 111%
1 8TB
488GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 133
Write 132
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 61.1
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.7
310% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 116%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 29 28 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 125
Write 133
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 28.5
66% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.7
322% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 15.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,069 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97M-PLUS - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $998
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback