Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion g7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion g7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3562
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '21 at 15:03
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
23% Poor
Memory 40.5
1-Core 17.1
2-Core 32.1
21% 29.9 Pts
4-Core 33.5
8-Core 34.5
5% 34 Pts
64-Core 34.2
2% 34.2 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
HP(103C 3562) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.43 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 250GB-$34
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 158 225 274 305 318 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 375
Write 308
Mixed 254
SusWrite 260
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 9
36% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 79.7
DQ Write 70.1
DQ Mixed 19.6
30% 56.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 98%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
10GB free, PID 0121
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 3.6 5.2 2.8 1.7 6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Read 14.4
Write 2.2
Mixed 9
SusWrite 3.3
8% 7.22 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP594908-HR1-ELFE 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 5.8
14% 4.77 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 4
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 200
20% 200 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion g7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 740 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion g7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $78
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback