Today's hottest deals

Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory16.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160811
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 11 '17 at 16:03
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 3.20GHz
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 58.3
1-Core 61.9
2-Core 141
50% 87.2 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 613
59% 487 Pts
64-Core 783
48% 783 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.4% Above average
Lighting 67.8
Reflection 58.5
Parallax 117
55% 81 fps
MRender 58.7
Gravity 90.7
Splatting 75.3
62% 74.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$100
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X35510RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 479
Write 226
Mixed 242
69% 316 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 8.94
62% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 25.1
DQ Write 94.9
DQ Mixed 8.53
22% 42.8 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSB.16FAR BLS8G4D240FSB.16FAD BLS8G4D240FSB.16FAR BLS8G4D240FSB.16FAD 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
110% Outstanding
MC Read 52.6
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 44.2
129% 45.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 11.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $768
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback