Today's hottest deals

Samsung 950XDA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive351% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemSamsung 950XDA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT950XDA-XC78W
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '21 at 10:13
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 79.2
1-Core 164
2-Core 339
102% 194 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 747
81% 642 Pts
64-Core 743
46% 743 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Sanyo(144D C852) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 20.6
Parallax 28.7
19% 24.2 fps
Gravity 32.3
Splatting 0.1
12% 16.2 fps
Poor: 8% Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2256HCHQ-00B 256GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7CK2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2345 1093 419 419 424 418 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
351% Outstanding
Read 2,970
Write 2,485
Mixed 2,286
SusWrite 853
480% 2,148 MB/s
4K Read 82.3
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 115
378% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,489
DQ Write 1,311
DQ Mixed 1,374
1,037% 1,392 MB/s
Poor: 180%
This bench: 351%
Great: 351%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
41.3% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 10.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 13.5
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 950XDA Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 950XDA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback