Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory15.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateMay 02 '21 at 18:54
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$89
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Memory 48.6
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 90.6
47% 76.6 Pts
4-Core 89.6
8-Core 85.7
12% 87.6 Pts
64-Core 12.9
1% 12.9 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,148
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52% Above average
Lighting 74.3
Reflection 97.1
Parallax 77.5
61% 83 fps
MRender 48.9
Gravity 34
Splatting 46.2
35% 43 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 52%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM21.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 254
Write 160
Mixed 154
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 0.7
30% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 9.7
24% 54.4 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
SSD 120GB
52GB free
Firmware: SBFM01.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 87 70 119 104 165 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.8% Poor
Read 141
Write 84.3
Mixed 101
SusWrite 109
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 6.5
22% 7.57 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 119
105% 157 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 94%
PNY CS3030 1TB SSD
719GB free
Firmware: CS303227
SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 323 426 356 315 434 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 961
Mixed 431
SusWrite 391
128% 565 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 11.4
55% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 684
DQ Write 742
DQ Mixed 895
623% 774 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 286%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
60GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 68 74 87 75 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 117
Write 92.9
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 82.6
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 75%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
246GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 42 50 55 50 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 67.7
Write 59.2
Mixed 35
SusWrite 50.7
39% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 G.SKILL F4-2400C17-8GIS CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 G.SKILL F4-2400C17-8GIS 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.7% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 14.2
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 8.2
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $918
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback