Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory57.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '21 at 20:36
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$220
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 148
2-Core 292
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 589
8-Core 1,166
104% 878 Pts
64-Core 2,151
133% 2,151 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$747
MSI(1462 3892) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 466.27
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 291
Reflection 254
Parallax 292
238% 279 fps
Gravity 242
Splatting 175
180% 208 fps
Poor: 163% Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1821 1607 1489 1354 1432 1454 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,902
Write 2,523
Mixed 1,562
SusWrite 1,526
424% 1,878 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 41.3
135% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 597
DQ Write 601
DQ Mixed 659
479% 619 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 238%
Great: 448%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$212
4.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 152 148 151 156 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 138
Write 149
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 152
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 97%
Hitachi HDS724040AL 4TB
36GB free
Firmware: MJAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 85 86 85 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 75.9
Write 75.6
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 84.9
48% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 93%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$212
1.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 114 112 109 119 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
65% Good
Read 113
Write 115
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 113
72% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65%
Great: 97%
Amd-raid Array 3 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 327 332 332 332 334 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 322
Write 309
Mixed 159
SusWrite 330
205% 280 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.8
254% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 187%
Great: 251%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 61.3
MC Write 45
MC Mixed 44.3
143% 50.2 GB/s
SC Read 32.1
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 42.5
97% 33.9 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 134%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,713 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,057
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback