Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87AF
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '21 at 04:48
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 133
2-Core 264
90% 163 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 691
72% 579 Pts
64-Core 736
46% 736 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 87AF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.96% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 85.7
Parallax 7.5
5% 33.2 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10.6
8% 9.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.96%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+477G 512GB
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 542 551 364 219 59 54 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 94%
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84
119GB free
Firmware: 2.0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 348 340 347 340 338 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 431
Write 207
Mixed 124
SusWrite 343
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 10.5
48% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 34.8
DQ Write 12.2
DQ Mixed 13.4
12% 20.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M4S16S682LJJJ43-12 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 28.1
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 27.9
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx Builds (Compare 2,383 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback