PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) (all builds) |
Memory | 6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190124 |
Uptime | 4.2 Days |
Run Date | Apr 27 '21 at 18:00 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 37% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.5%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pcie SSD 512GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 410 368 335 311 304 MB/s
|
116%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
97GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 98 102 104 101 106 MB/s
|
67.9%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G4D30CESTK.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
53.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $235Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 1,981x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $380Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 1,551x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $126Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 1,447x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $470Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 540x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $275Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 527x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $140Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 469x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $844 |