Today's hottest deals

Toshiba SATELLITE L755

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L755  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '21 at 10:42
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 62.3
1-Core 18.9
2-Core 55.2
31% 45.5 Pts
4-Core 96.4
8-Core 181
16% 139 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 525M
Toshiba(1179 FC50) 1GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
2.3% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.83 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 3
Splatting 2.2
2% 3.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.3%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 90GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 332ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 69 74 74 77 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 149
Write 87.5
Mixed 109
SusWrite 73.9
23% 105 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 11.1
42% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 93.6
DQ Mixed 112
84% 114 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 55%
Generic- SD/MMC 125GB
46GB free, PID 0109
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 18.7
Write 12.3
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 12.3
19% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3.3
223% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 M471B5273CH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.2
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE L755 Builds (Compare 515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L755

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $185
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback