Today's hottest deals

Asus Z170-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics66.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z170-K  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '21 at 04:09
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 217
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 629
64% 519 Pts
64-Core 597
37% 597 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$225
Asus(1043 872A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.4% Good
Lighting 83.3
Reflection 81
Parallax 75.4
68% 79.9 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 72.7
Splatting 65.3
64% 79.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 263 249 237 229 220 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 416
Mixed 403
SusWrite 256
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 53.9
181% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
88GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 144 143 144 144 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 134
Write 128
Mixed 80.1
SusWrite 143
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 109%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08WN4A0 1TB
167GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 108 110 110 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 144
Write 145
Mixed 108
SusWrite 109
170% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
114% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 70%
WDC WD40 03FZEX-00Z4SA0 4TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 113 110 112 111 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 104
Write 107
Mixed 83.6
SusWrite 111
138% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
137% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 63%
KINGSTON SV300S37A240G 240GB
1GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 180
Write 194
Mixed 202
252% 192 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 17.8
1,559% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 34.5
DQ Mixed 26.4
2,160% 28.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 159%
WDC WD10 EADS-11M2B2 1TB
101GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.8 2.9 3.1 1.9 3.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 57.6
Write 58.6
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 4.2
54% 42 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.2% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.1
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-K Builds (Compare 2,931 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-K - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $804
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback