Today's hottest deals

Asus P5GC-MX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5GC-MX  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '21 at 08:56
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual E2140-$80
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Memory 26.1
1-Core 10.8
2-Core 19.3
13% 18.7 Pts
4-Core 23.4
8-Core 33.1
4% 28.2 Pts
64-Core 33.5
2% 33.5 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 838B) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 18.1
15% 21.1 fps
MRender 27.9
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 18.4
18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 506ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 77 60 61 83 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 69.2
Write 68.9
Mixed 93.1
SusWrite 69.6
17% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 15.4
48% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21.4
DQ Write 82.2
DQ Mixed 24.6
27% 42.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
8.94% Terrible
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.13 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 2
5% 1.7 GB/s
Latency 279
14% 279 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.94%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5GC-MX Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5GC-MX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback