Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '21 at 20:54
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9500 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 60.8
1-Core 70
2-Core 114
49% 81.5 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 113
15% 112 Pts
64-Core 99.6
6% 99.6 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
AMD(1002 1E60) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
6.45% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 12.4
6% 9.63 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 8.4
6% 7.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.45%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
866GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 100 68 31 80 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 104
Write 79.8
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 71.2
52% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.2
52% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7EH55AA#ABM 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.5% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 9.8
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback