Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire X1470

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire X1470  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire X1470
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '21 at 17:07
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User PRI-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 40.6
2-Core 79.4
42% 64.2 Pts
4-Core 80.6
8-Core 78.5
11% 79.6 Pts
64-Core 52
3% 52 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6410D
Acer(1025 061D) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
1.67% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 1.9
2% 2.07 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.67%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$59
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 31 24 86 87 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 72.3
Write 56.2
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 58.5
42% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unifosa GU512303EP0202 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 3.3
13% 4.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 5.7
15% 5.37 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X1470 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X1470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback