Today's hottest deals

HP 120-011IN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 120-011IN  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B39
Memory6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141111
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 14 '21 at 05:20
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$120
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 76
1-Core 57.3
2-Core 139
54% 90.7 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 115
22% 149 Pts
64-Core 120
7% 120 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8576) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 3.4
4% 4.1 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 5
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 105 126 105 131 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 93.6
Write 73
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 116
58% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
170GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 118 115 119 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 115
Write 117
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 117
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS512MLK64V3H JM1600KLH-8G 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.67 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 4.8
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 120-011IN Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 120-011IN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback