Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z97 Extreme6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151006
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 13 '21 at 06:09
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$75
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 199
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 466
50% 400 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0412) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 8
Parallax 6.1
3% 5.87 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 130 146 144 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 153
Write 144
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 139
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
1GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 196
Write 161
Mixed 98.8
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
20GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 100 99 99 99 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 100
Mixed 81
SusWrite 100
71% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
80GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 121 123 122 122 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 120
Write 112
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 122
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 109%
WD My Passport Essential 320GB
135GB free, PID 070a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.8 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
7.88% Terrible
Read 35.7
Write 4.5
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 4.8
13% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.88%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1800 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 19.2
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 18.5
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Extreme6 - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $853
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback