Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics40.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory63.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 63.5GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory56.5 GB free of 63.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '21 at 00:57
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 87%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2-$142
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 51.3
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 170
56% 103 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 683
60% 510 Pts
64-Core 1,025
63% 1,025 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$72
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.2% Average
Lighting 49.3
Reflection 52.7
Parallax 67.5
40% 56.5 fps
MRender 56.1
Gravity 53.5
Splatting 41.4
40% 50.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 129GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 620
Write 552
Mixed 457
121% 543 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 5.7
21% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 83%
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 26 42 35 37 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
8.66% Terrible
Read 46.1
Write 29.1
Mixed 288
SusWrite 45.3
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 2.8
14% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.66%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 63GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 15872 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
MC Read 60.1
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 37.4
118% 41.4 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4.7
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 159%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $286WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback