Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive416% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '21 at 18:18
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$130
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 88.9
1-Core 144
2-Core 286
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 841
86% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,103
68% 1,103 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 123
Parallax 129
112% 130 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 106
Splatting 91.6
91% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$128
452GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 611100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2211 1902 1766 1900 1749 1568 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
416% Outstanding
Read 3,472
Write 2,434
Mixed 2566
SusWrite 1,849
577% 2,580 MB/s
4K Read 74.6
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 95.7
338% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,441
DQ Write 1243
DQ Mixed 1,318
994% 1,334 MB/s
Poor: 228%
This bench: 416%
Great: 595%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
737GB free
Firmware: UH4400RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 88 114 114 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 406
Write 74.5
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 103
36% 168 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 14.9
50% 11.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38%
Great: 58%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
464GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.1% Poor
Read 42
Write 39.8
Mixed 41.1
SusWrite 39.6
9% 40.6 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 15.1
50% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 33.6
DQ Write 26.6
DQ Mixed 26.3
21% 28.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 97%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$110
63GB free
Firmware: RT17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 135 135 183 125 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 56.8
Write 118
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 141
63% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 0.6
242% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 87%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$256
62GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 176 129 135 158 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 142
Write 142
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 158
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.1
314% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 110%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
64GB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 129 130 131 137 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 167
Write 147
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 133
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
306% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 109%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$256
61GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 166 171 174 160 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 178
Mixed 82.4
SusWrite 169
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.2
298% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 110%
WD WD100EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB
68GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 52 50 48 47 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 206
Write 199
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 53.8
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.8
239% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$180
59GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 133 137 144 149 148 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 90%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
442GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 49 47 47 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 203
Write 209
Mixed 106
SusWrite 53.9
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1
301% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 105%
ASMT 2105 6TB
65GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 184 183 183 179 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 195
Write 258
Mixed 149
SusWrite 185
270% 197 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.1
182% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 39.9
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 30
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 41.8
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 104%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,845 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 183%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $963
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback