Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '21 at 07:28
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$151
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 144
2-Core 289
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1,032
97% 804 Pts
64-Core 1,476
91% 1,476 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 150
Parallax 150
126% 151 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 131
Splatting 117
114% 143 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 887 615 586 596 601 583 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 2,518
Write 2,229
Mixed 1,595
SusWrite 645
390% 1,747 MB/s
4K Read 65.6
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 71.9
233% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1184
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 319
323% 553 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 243%
Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
129GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 445 401 280 271 280 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 445
Mixed 442
SusWrite 355
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 48.9
167% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 181
137% 185 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 102%
Great: 128%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
147GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 467 393 284 275 284 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 474
Mixed 467
SusWrite 363
102% 456 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 51.4
172% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 190
144% 198 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 126%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
412GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 440 436 446 430 316 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 440
Mixed 447
SusWrite 419
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 43.2
147% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 89.6
DQ Mixed 165
119% 158 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 129%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$63
167GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 103 105 105 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 154
Write 142
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 104
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 108%
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB
129GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 132 133 136 129 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 141
Write 135
Mixed 91.3
SusWrite 133
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.3
261% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 36.3
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 30.1
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 40.1
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $918
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback