Today's hottest deals

MSI B460M-A PRO (MS-7C88)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C88
MotherboardMSI B460M-A PRO (MS-7C88)  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200821
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 29 '21 at 10:33
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$69
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 253
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 677
71% 570 Pts
64-Core 608
38% 608 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.47 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
3% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2011XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 58 7.4 72 16 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 467
Write 397
Mixed 253
SusWrite 49.1
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 15.9
4K Mixed 0.4
44% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 73.8
DQ Write 18.4
DQ Mixed 0.4
12% 30.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 166%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
437GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 112 112 112 112 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 104
Write 74.5
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 111
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
DDR4 8GB 3000MHz 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 7.9
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 10.7
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B460M-A PRO (MS-7C88) Builds (Compare 4,644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI B460M-A PRO (MS-7C88) - $197

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $587
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback