Today's hottest deals

Samsung 905S3G/906S3G/915S3G/9305SG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemSamsung 905S3G/906S3G/915S3G/9305SG  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP905S3G-KD2BR
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '21 at 01:07
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Quad-Core Processor (up to 1.4GHz)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Memory 29.6
1-Core 10.5
2-Core 16.8
14% 19 Pts
4-Core 26.4
8-Core 40.4
4% 33.4 Pts
64-Core 46.3
3% 46.3 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8250
Sanyo(144D C730) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 16.12.2
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 122 126 121 123 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 305
Write 131
Mixed 108
SusWrite 124
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 9.5
32% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 96.1
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 44.6
52% 87.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 2.8
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 257
16% 257 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 905S3G/906S3G/915S3G/9305SG Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 905S3G/906S3G/915S3G/9305SG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback