Today's hottest deals

HP 500B Microtower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP 500B Microtower  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2A8C
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110321
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '21 at 11:32
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5800-$58
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 45.6
2-Core 77.8
38% 60.2 Pts
4-Core 84.1
8-Core 81.9
11% 83 Pts
64-Core 89.5
6% 89.5 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
HP(103C 2A8C) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.53 fps
Splatting 0.3
0% 0.3 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JPFOA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 83 91 62 36 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 95.8
Write 92.9
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 64.9
56% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4
12% 4.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500B Microtower Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500B Microtower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback