Today's hottest deals

MSI A78M-E35 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI A78M-E35 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '21 at 00:22
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-6300 APU-$51
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
40.2% Average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 98.9
48% 76.3 Pts
4-Core 96.6
8-Core 99.6
13% 98.1 Pts
64-Core 96.7
6% 96.7 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$91
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.4% Poor
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 34.6
Parallax 33.3
27% 33.7 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 23.6
25% 31.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk U100 128GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.56.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 266 262 299 296 249 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 412
Write 267
Mixed 102
SusWrite 258
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 8.6
42% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 34.1
DQ Write 10.1
DQ Mixed 12.4
12% 18.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 55%
Hitachi HTS721010G9SA00 100GB
10GB free
Firmware: MCZOC10H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 36 37 38 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 42.5
Write 40.6
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 36.1
27% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673GB0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.1% Poor
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 9.2
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 10.3
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A78M-E35 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A78M-E35 (MS-7721) - $63

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $176
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback