Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X8DA6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemSupermicro X8DA6  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X8DA6
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100914
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 17 '21 at 00:19
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5645
CPU 2, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 133
51% 87.8 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 368
39% 312 Pts
64-Core 934
58% 934 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Lighting 51.5
Reflection 50.3
Parallax 40.3
42% 47.4 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 35.4
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 80GB-$60
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 92 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 168
Write 92.7
Mixed 100
SusWrite 91.9
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 13.5
50% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 17.6
DQ Write 37.5
DQ Mixed 17.8
16% 24.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 45%
LSI Logical Volume 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 567 559 566 560 501 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 526
Write 515
Mixed 137
SusWrite 541
96% 430 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 2.3
22% 7.07 MB/s
DQ Read 48.2
DQ Write 12.2
DQ Mixed 6.1
11% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 62%
SanDisk Ultra 125GB
103GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 8.8 8.3 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 30
Write 9.5
Mixed 10
SusWrite 9.9
17% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.8
117% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KBL96B2P2G1SH920-M KBL96B2P2G1SH920-M KBL96B2P2G1SH920-M KBL96B2P2G1SH920-M KBL96B2P2G1SH920-M KBL96B2P2G1SH920-M 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.3% Average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 19.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.7
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X8DA6 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Supermicro X8DA6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback