Today's hottest deals

MSI H270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics89.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A64
MotherboardMSI H270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64)  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '17 at 12:21
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 228
85% 148 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 664
66% 541 Pts
64-Core 669
41% 669 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Lighting 114
Reflection 116
Parallax 99.6
93% 110 fps
MRender 98.9
Gravity 103
Splatting 103
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 256GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0925A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 510
Write 333
Mixed 352
88% 398 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 17.4
108% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 33
DQ Write 80.9
DQ Mixed 17.1
24% 43.7 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 110%
Seagate SkyHawk 2TB (2016)-$75
1TB free
Firmware: CV12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 148
Mixed 137
114% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.2
74% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 99%
Seagate SkyHawk 2TB (2016)-$75
846GB free
Firmware: CV12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 147
Write 142
Mixed 128
104% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.2
72% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 99%
Seagate SkyHawk 2TB (2016)-$75
207GB free
Firmware: CV12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 93.9
Write 95.1
Mixed 90.9
70% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.16
60% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
98GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 126
Write 121
Mixed 118
92% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.23
94% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 112%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
61GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 47.5
Write 98.2
Mixed 81.5
57% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.17
79% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 67%
ST2000VX 003-1HH164 2TB
861GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.3% Above average
Read 140
Write 121
Mixed 100
149% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.2
60% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 51%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
789GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 95.7
Write 101
Mixed 76.9
116% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.34
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 25.8
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 24.7
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64) Builds (Compare 315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI H270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback