Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82B5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 82B5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201020
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMar 09 '21 at 08:04
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 41.6
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 145
48% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 800
62% 555 Pts
64-Core 1,072
66% 1,072 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3A3E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.91
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.1% Below average
Lighting 43.9
Reflection 54.4
Parallax 44.9
36% 47.7 fps
MRender 51.5
Gravity 42.2
Splatting 42.6
37% 45.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L2 512GB
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1686 1107 794 793 794 796 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,699
Write 1,618
Mixed 1,387
SusWrite 995
320% 1,425 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 78.4
244% 85.9 MB/s
DQ Read 858
DQ Write 624
DQ Mixed 804
584% 762 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 238%
Great: 296%
hp v250w 32GB
21GB free, PID ae07
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 6.3 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
2.75% Terrible
Read 10.8
Write 9.8
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 5
10% 7.73 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.75%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3320MJ78HAF-3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 36.3
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 22.3
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82B5 Builds (Compare 1,546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 82B5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback