Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime9.8 Days
Run DateMar 05 '21 at 23:03
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 197
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 529
56% 446 Pts
64-Core 531
33% 531 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000
Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
21.8% Poor
Lighting 26.2
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 27.9
21% 28.2 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 28.2
Splatting 28.9
23% 27.3 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC480G1CS1754D117-514 480GB
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS111101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 210 241 241 244 242 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 330
Write 230
Mixed 205
SusWrite 228
56% 248 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 25.7
86% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 121
97% 136 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 99%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$49
345GB free
Firmware: 01.01V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 108 108 107 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 87
Write 83.9
Mixed 68.6
SusWrite 104
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
564GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 113 126 124 125 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 105
Write 99.3
Mixed 77.9
SusWrite 120
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 992031 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.2% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 17.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback