Today's hottest deals

Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive12.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7010  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 05 '21 at 11:49
Run Duration559 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 77.9
2-Core 134
59% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 233
27% 211 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 295
Nvidia(10DE 062E) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.25% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.1
0% 0.27 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.5 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.25%
Great: 1%
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 3530) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.44% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.6 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 6.7
3% 2.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.44%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 48 95 139 147 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 74.6
Write 46.2
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 105
18% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 3.6
10% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST5000LM000-2AN170 5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 45 94 127 123 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 18.7
Write 62.6
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 93.9
38% 52.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.2
64% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 64%
Seagate ST5000LM000-2AN170 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 86 108 105 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 40.1
Write 54.2
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 83.1
36% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.2
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 64%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
144GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 93 151 146 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 57.3
Write 65.8
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 105
50% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.3
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 87%
External USB3.0 DISK01 5TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.59% Terrible
Read 38.1
Write 4.2
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 0
11% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 9.59%
Great: 66%
External USB3.0 DISK02 5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.2 6.3 1.3 8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 58.9
Write 37.7
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 6.5
43% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 54%
External USB3.0 DISK00 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 60.1
Write 1.2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 0.1
11% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.3
66% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 77%
External USB3.0 DISK03 5TB
554GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.2% Very poor
Read 41.3
Write 8
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 0.1
11% 13 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.3
79% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 49%
External USB3.0 DISK04 5TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5 6.1 0.8 7.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.4% Very poor
Read 62.2
Write 88.4
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 6.2
68% 51.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 31%
WD My Passport 259D 3TB
496GB free, PID 259d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.7 1.5 2.8 2.7 2.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.13% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 11.2
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 1.8
12% 8.55 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.1
34% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 4.13%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
47.3% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.4
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 12,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback