Today's hottest deals

HP ENVY TS 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ENVY TS 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1967
Memory1.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160606
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJun 21 '17 at 14:42
Run Duration636 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 65
2-Core 106
49% 79.2 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 261
27% 217 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 1967) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3304
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 9.42
Parallax 6.5
4% 6.8 fps
MRender 7.38
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.22
5% 5.61 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 483
Mixed 511
112% 499 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 40
145% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 135
137% 222 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
Lio-org FILEIO 719GB
392GB free
Firmware: 4.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.49% Terrible
Read 6.61
Write 5.16
Mixed 6.48
5% 6.09 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 0.57
4K Mixed 0.62
110% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 46%
Lio-org FILEIO 429GB
216GB free
Firmware: 4.0
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
5.13% Terrible
Read 8.49
Write 9.35
Mixed 6.6
6% 8.15 MB/s
4K Read 0.15
4K Write 0.14
4K Mixed 0.16
27% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.13%
Great: 31%
General USB Flash Disk 2GB
1GB free, PID 800b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.44% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 3.27
Mixed 5.16
8% 8.55 MB/s
4K Read 4.71
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.04
20% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.44%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-093.A00LF 9905428-095.D00LF 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.1% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 9.5
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY TS 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY TS 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback