PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | Acer Aspire E1-571G (all builds) |
Motherboard | Acer EA50_HC_CR |
Memory | 1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20131216 |
Uptime | 9.3 Days |
Run Date | Mar 03 '21 at 23:54 |
Run Duration | 274 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 26% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.4%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 064B) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
|
2.96%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 41 64 28 14 68 MB/s
|
33%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.9 10 9.9 9.9 9.9 MB/s
|
11%
Very poor
|
|||
SDXC Card 64GB
52GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 6.6 7.3 7.4 6.6 7.5 MB/s
|
9.79%
Terrible
|
|||
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
182GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 11 MB/s
|
10.4%
Very poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB
135GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
|
9.98%
Terrible
|
|||
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
37GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
|
10.4%
Very poor
|
|||
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
501GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 8.6 8.5 8.4 8.4 8.4 MB/s
|
10%
Very poor
|
|||
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
465GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.4 MB/s
|
9.2%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
30.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples | 164x |
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 58x |
Core i7-3632QMIntelBench 61%, 24,912 samples | 50x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 344x |
GeForce 710MNvidiaBench 3%, 2,241 samples | 54x |
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 49x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $124 |