Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics74% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DH87MC
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130606
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMar 03 '21 at 22:42
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 144
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 449
46% 371 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74% Very good
Lighting 93.1
Reflection 95.3
Parallax 84.7
76% 91 fps
MRender 96.4
Gravity 90.5
Splatting 75.9
70% 87.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$27
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 87 116 11 49 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 463
Write 348
Mixed 326
SusWrite 69.7
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 27
109% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 164
145% 214 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 137 136 138 137 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 96.5
Write 104
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 134
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.5
182% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$31
61GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 86 88 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 86.8
Write 82
Mixed 66
SusWrite 86.2
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate USB 3.0 Cable 1.5TB
12GB free, PID 5030
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 59 58 57 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
21% Poor
Read 49.3
Write 51.3
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 57.3
58% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.6% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 14.8
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 11.1
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $381
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback