Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro12,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics4.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacBookPro12,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-E43C1C25D4880AD6
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201217
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 03 '21 at 07:54
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5257U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Memory 22.3
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 28.4
26% 38.8 Pts
4-Core 68.3
8-Core 202
15% 135 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 6100 (Mobile)
Apple(106B 013F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
4.25% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 5.6
4% 4.17 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 7
Splatting 6.7
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.25%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32A0T54B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 350 664 711 643 730 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 291
Write 300
Mixed 299
SusWrite 597
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 10.8
28% 8.4 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 223
181% 260 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 372%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x483943434E4E4E424C54414C41522D4E5544 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 5.9
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 304
13% 304 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro12,1 Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro12,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback