Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '21 at 15:28
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 50.5
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 115
44% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 198
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Asus(1043 83B5) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 15.3
13% 18.2 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 17.7
Splatting 16.2
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GMTE110S 128GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111B1L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 176 85 69 65 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 1,242
Write 483
Mixed 526
SusWrite 111
129% 591 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 18.9
113% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 298
222% 299 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 103%
Great: 157%
Maxtor STM3160215AS 160GB
141GB free
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 64 56 57 73 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 68.8
Write 11.7
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 57.4
31% 42.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 41%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
18GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.8 4.8 8.4 7.2 8.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 20.9
Write 23.9
SusWrite 6.4
21% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.5% Poor
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback