Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B84
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84)  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '21 at 16:48
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 753
73% 603 Pts
64-Core 921
57% 921 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.4% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 107
Parallax 98.4
83% 102 fps
MRender 93.7
Gravity 99.7
Splatting 96.1
79% 96.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 213 212 196 212 208 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 354
Write 267
Mixed 284
SusWrite 201
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 36.5
131% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 152
142% 222 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 29.1
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 25.6
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84) Builds (Compare 595 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback