Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire E1-772G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-772G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA70_HW
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '17 at 19:34
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 168
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 238
31% 235 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0821) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.82% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 6.53
3% 5.67 fps
MRender 7.57
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.74
5% 5.89 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.82%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$13
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 108
Write 71.9
Mixed 53.2
58% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 0.71
4K Mixed 0.19
46% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 61%
Asmt 2105 500GB
408GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 122
Write 110
Mixed 112
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 2.43
4K Mixed 0.26
106% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 17.8
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 19.6
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-772G Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-772G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback