Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88X Extreme4+  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '21 at 09:14
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Memory 36.6
1-Core 28.2
2-Core 107
31% 57.2 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 162
21% 157 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
ASRock(1849 130F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
5.38% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 11.8
5% 8.33 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 6.7
6% 6.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 201 212 214 223 215 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.8% Above average
Read 244
Write 260
Mixed 228
SusWrite 207
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 28.7
80% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 37
DQ Write 86.5
DQ Mixed 50
41% 57.8 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 129%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$53
193GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 116 118 119 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 131
Write 79.7
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 116
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 84%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 110 109 110 111 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 104
Write 64.9
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 108
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$111
324GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 87 86 83 83 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 136
Mixed 98.6
SusWrite 84.4
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.7
374% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$111
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 124 124 123 122 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 84.2
Write 97.4
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 122
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.5
185% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 90%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
1TB free, PID 61b7
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 64 65 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 48.4
Write 48.4
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 63.4
77% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.4
139% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Vulcan-2400 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27% Poor
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 11.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 219
18% 219 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88X Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+ - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $252
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback