Today's hottest deals

PC Tornado R3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPC Tornado R3  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '21 at 21:07
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$330
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Memory 87.3
1-Core 154
2-Core 306
99% 183 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 1,179
105% 886 Pts
64-Core 2,152
133% 2,152 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$145
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44% Average
Lighting 57.5
Reflection 57.8
Parallax 49.6
47% 55 fps
MRender 42.6
Gravity 51.7
Splatting 46.1
38% 46.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s34 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,897
Write 950
Mixed 896
274% 1,248 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 57.5
224% 86.4 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 787
DQ Mixed 469
381% 524 MB/s
Poor: 76% Great: 244%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
442GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 172 174 176 175 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 165
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 174
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KLEVV KD4AGU880-36A180X 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 50.4
MC Write 44.8
MC Mixed 44.5
133% 46.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 38
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Tornado R3 Builds (Compare 287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: PC Tornado R3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $205
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback