Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H270-HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180410
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '21 at 00:03
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 94.3
1-Core 93.2
2-Core 245
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 706
70% 573 Pts
64-Core 699
43% 699 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.9% Very good
Lighting 97.9
Reflection 109
Parallax 99.3
80% 102 fps
MRender 92.3
Gravity 95.4
Splatting 95.1
77% 94.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$65
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 628 296 292 286 278 278 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,829
Write 1302
Mixed 618
SusWrite 343
226% 1,023 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 52.6
209% 82 MB/s
DQ Read 1,155
DQ Write 887
DQ Mixed 799
658% 947 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 203%
Great: 254%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$40
9GB free
Firmware: M0CR070
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 409
Write 335
Mixed 295
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 31.9
131% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 253
189% 249 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 95%
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54
252GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 43 6.3 6.4 6.3 7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
64% Good
Read 439
Write 366
Mixed 367
SusWrite 81.6
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 19.8
103% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 36.7
88% 177 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
55GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 96 97 97 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 116
Write 85.8
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 95.7
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 113%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
14GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 12 11 12 11 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
5.97% Terrible
Read 19.9
Write 3.7
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 11
12% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.97%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
78.4% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 22.2
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 23.8
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 1,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback