Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 299 User benchmarks, average bench 28% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Memory 28.3 1-Core 15.4 2-Core 29.4 16% 24.4 Pts	4-Core 28.2 8-Core 31.5 4% 29.9 Pts	64-Core 26.9 2% 26.9 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 7768) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	0.95% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.37 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.95% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 776GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 70 69 123 153 144 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	74.6% Very good	Read 146 Write 39.1 Mixed 73.2 SusWrite 114 69% 93 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 109%
WD 2500BEV External 250GB 752 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 110GB free, PID 0704 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 11 9 18 19 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 18.9 Write 14.8 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 15.6 22% 16.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BD160B.C16F 2x4GB 2,263 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	12.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 5.3 13% 4.43 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 3.5 8% 2.87 GB/s	Latency 265 15% 265 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM