Today's hottest deals

Asus UX305FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 64% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus UX305FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX305FA
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150427
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '21 at 13:56
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 21%
CPU Throttled 64%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core M-5Y71
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Memory 45.5
1-Core 22.2
2-Core 46.9
26% 38.2 Pts
4-Core 70.3
8-Core 35.8
8% 53.1 Pts
64-Core 49.1
3% 49.1 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300
Asus(1043 181D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
2.45% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.7
2% 2.53 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.45%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SN3Q512G1002 512GB
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2170002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 260 280 284 282 242 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 353
Write 297
Mixed 227
SusWrite 267
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 8.3
46% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 101
86% 126 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 7.9
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UX305FA Builds (Compare 207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX305FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback