Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20344

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20344  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141016
Uptime17.8 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '21 at 08:29
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4010U-$280
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 81.4
1-Core 45.3
2-Core 79
46% 68.6 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 133
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3978) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
1.15% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 5.8
0% 2.77 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.15%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000MPCK-24AWHT0 500GB
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 65 60 59 42 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 99.2
Write 94.1
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 55.9
55% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 16.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 13.4
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20344 Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20344

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback