Today's hottest deals

EVGA 120-LF-E650

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardEVGA 120-LF-E650  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091208
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 11 '17 at 19:14
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$40
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 69
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 134
54% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 183
25% 184 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
Gigabyte(1458 2206) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.850.0.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
5.04% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 6.31
Parallax 5.53
5% 6.01 fps
MRender 6.38
Gravity 5.47
Splatting 6.43
5% 6.09 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.04%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46% Average
Read 89.9
Write 71
Mixed 22.6
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.09
4K Write 0.22
4K Mixed 0.11
20% 0.14 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46%
Great: 63%
Generic Storage Device 64GB
11GB free, PID 1338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.7% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 13.6
Mixed 21.4
25% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.87
4K Write 0.95
4K Mixed 0.73
68% 1.52 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
29% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 12.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7.1
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 120-LF-E650 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: EVGA 120-LF-E650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback