Today's hottest deals

Biostar A32M2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A32M2  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200715
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '21 at 05:28
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 64.8
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 196
66% 120 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 338
44% 329 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Biostar(1565 170B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 19.3
10% 14.6 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 13.7
10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX8100NP 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB421D57
SusWrite @10s intervals: 903 984 160 875 479 357 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 2027
Write 1,015
Mixed 987
SusWrite 626
257% 1,164 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 53.8
181% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 665
DQ Write 671
DQ Mixed 669
503% 669 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 205%
Great: 274%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
905GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 190 191 194 195 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 206
Write 188
Mixed 107
SusWrite 192
127% 173 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 114%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GIS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.9% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 11
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 11
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A32M2 Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A32M2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback