Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 5737Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive10% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire 5737Z  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer KALA0
Memory0 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '21 at 21:34
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4200-$99
Socket uFCPGA, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Memory 52.4
1-Core 10.8
2-Core 42
25% 35.1 Pts
4-Core 41.7
8-Core 47.8
6% 44.8 Pts
64-Core 49.1
3% 49.1 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400M G
Acer(1025 0160) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 327.02
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.63% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.5 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.63%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMK1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 50 41 21 44 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
10% Very poor
Read 79.5
Write 138
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 40.7
18% 80 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 3.7
14% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 10%
Great: 94%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
444GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 28 31 29 18 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 43.6
Write 47
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 25.6
26% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.7 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 0.1
4% 1.5 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5737Z Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5737Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback